There are two ways of seeing the tolerance of a certain unilateral policy. First, tolerance can be inferred from the powers conferred on the parties in a general agreement established in advance. If the terms of the agreement […] provide for or authorize a party to subsequently adopt a specific unilateral policy binding on the other party, the tolerance of that policy by the other party may be established on its basis. Second, in the absence of such an explicit tolerance, the Commission can demonstrate the existence of tacit tolerance. In that regard, it must be demonstrated, first, that one party explicitly or implicitly requires the cooperation of the other party in order to implement its unilateral policy and, second, that the other party has complied with that requirement through the implementation of that unilateral policy. The main points of the EU`s system of regulation of vertical restraints are as follows: however, the Commission is very selective in choosing the rules on which it will give informal guidance and, given the existence of the vertical block exemption and the vertical guidelines, it is unlikely that the Commission will issue individual guidelines on vertical restraints. In general, the Commission considers that the parties are well placed to analyse the effects of their own conduct. The authors are not aware of any case in which the Commission has proposed informal guidance to the parties. The Commission has published guidelines on vertical restraints.

This supports it in the interpretation of the regulations and sets out the Commission`s policy to help companies self-value the agreements. If the participants have less than 30% market share and the agreement is less than five years old, the block exemption applies. The exemption applies to direct and indirect prohibitions of competition. These include exclusive purchase obligations. In accordance with Article 101(2), restrictions of competition which are contrary to Article 101(1) and which are not eligible for an exemption under Article 101(3) are heeded. The exact consequences of a declaration of nullity depend on the text of the Treaty itself and on the provisions of the applicable national contract law on the salvatoriale clause. There are two main alternative consequences: either the entire agreement is invalid and unenforceable, or the prohibited restriction can be separated from the rest of the agreement and the prohibited restriction alone is invalid and unenforceable. . .

.